The latest RQ includes five vignettes, per detailing an attitude with the matchmaking overall: cover, preoccupation, dismissing-protection, and you may fearful-reduction

2.step 3.3 Relationships Questionnaire

The latest connection sign of your own caregivers is actually assessed making use of the Relationship Questionnaire (RQ; Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991 ; Spruit & Meesters, 2018 ). Members ranked the level where for each and every description applies to them towards the a good eight-area scale (cannot apply to all of the to totally can be applied). The relationship Questionnaire once the a way of measuring mature accessory might have been widely used and has shown adequate concurrent validity given that reviewed with procedures out-of social performing (Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991 ) and you will behavioral and you will personality qualities (Klohnen & Bera, 1998 ).

dos.3.4 Mind-Mindedness Interviews

Caregivers’ brain-mindedness try examined with the Mind-Mindedness Interviews (Meins, Fernyhough, Russell, & Clark-Carter, 1998 ). Caregivers done the newest define-your-guy measure. The brand new interview was in fact coded following the manual from Meins and you will Fernyhough ( 2015 ). Caregivers’ definitions of their guy was indeed split up into discrete sentences and you may each phrase is classified the following: mind-relevant definitions (we.elizabeth., rational descriptions, hobbies, choice, requires, desires, and you can thinking), decisions meanings (i.elizabeth., behavioural, actual, or general meanings), secret benefits otherwise standard comments (we.e., on the most other or associated subjects where zero malfunction of the child was provided). The fresh new psychological valence each and every brain-related breakdown are categorized because the often confident, bad, or neutral, according to research by the statements in itself (Demers, Bernier, Tarabulsy, & Provost, 2010 ). Parents’ positive brain-mindedness shows their symbolization of kid’s rational states because the best for a healthier and adaptive advancement (i.e., “the guy likes the firm away from other youngsters,” “the woman is interested,” “he is commonly very happy”). On the other hand, parents’ bad head-mindedness is actually a manifestation of its symbolization of child’s mind with regards to anxieties, frustration, and you may understanding of your own children’s difficulties (we.e., “he’s usually concerned,” “she will be able to end up being egoistic,” “he does not for example others’ interest”). Parents’ brain-related description with no specific positive otherwise negative valence is classified just like the simple (we.e., “he has got a strong usually,” “she will not want to be the initial you to definitely,” “he’s a compulsive”). Parents’ confident and you may neutral brain-related statements was indeed joint, whereas bad attention-related descriptions was basically examined independently. An entire score out of notice-mindedness (and confident/neutral and you will bad breakdown) was also integrated given that general capabilities regarding mentalization. Mind-mindedness score was basically the latest quantities of intellectual descriptors conveyed as a great ratio of one’s final number regarding descriptors included in order so you can handle to have differences in caregivers’ verbosity.

Score on the total brain-mindedness and for the a couple valences was determined due to the fact proportions of the total amount of statements moms and dads generated (Meins & Fernyhough, 2015 ). Instructed coders (letter = 5) individually rated the latest interviews and you may 15% (letter = 67) try randomly selected to help you estimate the fresh interrater agreement one of many programmers. Interrater arrangement to the proportion of brain-related comments for each and every transcript try a good (ICC = .96) and also for the coding of your valance out-of confident/natural, and bad comments interrater arrangement was also ample (ICCs = .95 and you may .91, respectively).

2.step three.5 Attachment Q-Sort

This new Accessory Q-Types (AQS; Waters & Deane, 1985 ) assesses connection security of kids between 1 and you may five years dated (secure-base decisions) and has now ninety affairs. New 90 items are sorted when you look at the nine clusters of activities with ten factors for every single. Attachment score try computed from the calculating the relationship amongst the observer type and a standards sort of the brand new prototypically secure boy (the fresh cutoff an incredible number of Park and you can Seas [ 1989 ], Oceans & Deane [ 1985 ]). A rating beneath the cutoff ways too little attachment shelter. Towards current data were used: to have males a rating less than .twenty-five as well as ladies a get below .thirty six try perceived as insufficient attachment security. Search towards the validity of your connection Q-kinds demonstrated sufficient convergent, discriminant, and you will predictive validity (Van Ijzendoorn, Vereijken, Bakermans-Kranenburg, & Riksen-Walraven, 2004 ). The fresh new AQS try arranged of the educated scientists, and you can eleven% of one’s cases (n = 9) have been double-coded. The fresh ICC of your own persisted AQS score between your experts during the the present day analysis are .76, that is indicative of great interrater arrangement (Koo & Li, 2016 ).