Information for the 2011 nationwide Household Survey Visible minority adjustable were released on might 8, 2013, included in a built-in launch with other ethnocultural and Aboriginal factors.
To learn more about and usage of 2011 NHS information, please reference the Census Program web site.
Information quality
The nationwide Household Survey (NHS) underwent an extensive data quality evaluation much like the thing that was done for the 2011 Census of populace and previous censuses. It contains an evaluation of varied information quality indicators (such as for example reaction rate), and an assessment of this results that are overall when comparing to other information sources such as for instance census of populace information.
Survey procedure
Quality indicators had been determined and examined at each one of the key actions for the study. Throughout the collection and processing for the data, the standard and persistence associated with the reactions supplied were evaluated since were the non-response prices. The quality of the imputed reactions ended up being examined following the conclusion regarding the control and imputation actions.
official Certification of last quotes
As soon as information processing and imputation had been completed, the information had been weighted to express the sum total population that is canadian. These weighted information (the last quotes) had been then certified to find out when they had been coherent and dependable compared to other separate information sources. This is basically the stage that is final of validation. The primary features of the assessment are presented below.
Non-response bias
For instance, in line with the quotes and styles from the sources stated earlier, proof implies that the Filipino populace group is overestimated at the level that is national. On the other hand, the Arab populace team is recommended to be underestimated within the 2011 NHS.
Generally speaking, the possibility of error increases for reduced degrees of geography as well as for smaller populations. The data sources used to evaluate these results are also less reliable making it difficult to certify these smaller counts at you can try these out the same time.
Information quality indicators
Of all of the quality indicators employed for the evaluation, two are presented: the worldwide non-response price together with imputation price by concern.
| Provinces and regions | populace team (percent) |
|---|---|
| Canada | 3.9 |
| Newfoundland and Labrador | 4.2 |
| Prince Edward Island | 4.2 |
| Nova Scotia | 3.4 |
| New Brunswick | 3.5 |
| Quebec | 3.6 |
| Ontario | 4.2 |
| Manitoba | 3.7 |
| Saskatchewan | 3.5 |
| Alberta | 3.8 |
| Uk Columbia | 3.8 |
| Yukon | 4.4 |
| Northwest Territories | 3.3 |
| Nunavut | 4.9 |
Comparability along with other information sources
The nationwide domestic Survey (NHS) happens to be Statistics Canada’s primary supply of information on populace group and also the minority population that is visible. Just before 2011, the Census of Population accumulated information about these ideas. Other home studies ( e.g. , the General Social Survey) additionally gather information from the populace team and minority population that is visible.
Many facets affect evaluations of populace team and minority that is visible information across these sources. Amongst other facets, comparability is suffering from variations in study target populations, guide period, sampling and collection methods; question wording, questionnaire structure, examples and guidelines; ways to information processing; the social and climate that is political the full time of information collection. For extra information, please see the National domestic Survey consumer Guide, Catalogue no. 99-001-X.
Is one thing no longer working? Will there be information outdated? Aren’t able to find what you are shopping for?
Please call us and write to us just just exactly how you can be helped by us.