Overall performance
We restricted analysis to the three major AAI classifications (Autonomous, Dismissive and Preoccupied) since the examination of unresolved states of mind with respect to attachment, and how these states of mind may be related to later caregiving behaviors and thinking, was beyond the scope of this paper. Replacing the 10 AAI-Unresolved protocols with secondary classifications resulted in 46 parents (59.7%) classified as Autonomous, twoo consistent with the van IJzendoorn and Bakermans-Kranenburg ( 1996 ) norms presented for the AAI (58% base rate). Seventeen parents (22.1%) were classified as Preoccupied and 14 (18.2%) as Dismissive. On the P-CAI, 50 parents were classified as Autonomous (64.9%), 16 as Dismissive (20.8%) and 11 as Preoccupied (14.3%). There were no assignments to the Disorganized category. Classification distributions did not differ for fathers, as compared to mothers, neither with respect to the AAI (Likelihood exact ratio G(2, 1) = 1.4, p = .49) nor regarding the P-CAI (Likelihood exact ratio G(dos, 1) = 2.4, p = .31).
Cross-tabulation of each parent’s attachment (AAI) and caregiving (P-CAI) classifications (Table 2) revealed strong concordance (fathers’ Likelihood exact ratio G(4, 1) = , p< .0001, Kappa = .61, p< .0001; mothers' Likelihood exact ratio G(4, 1) = 25.4, p < .0001, Kappa = .58, p< .0001). Prediction of P-CAI classification from AAI classification resulted in 77.8% exact agreement for fathers, 78% exact agreement for mothers, and 77.9% exact agreement for the entire sample (86% for Autonomous, 72.7% for Preoccupied and 56.2% for Dismissive).
Published online:
Stepwise logistic regression is actually did to the P-CAI categories dichotomized, insecure (Dismissive/Preoccupied) rather than safer (Autonomous). Preliminary analysis to assess potential has an effect on from records details (mother or father decades, many years of knowledge, number of youngsters, ages of notice son, relational standing) indicated that this new parent’s years of degree were of the the girl/his caregiving logo classification (Wald = 5.21, p = .02), with more many years of degree somewhat decreasing the probability of an enthusiastic Autonomous category with respect to parental caregiving. It varying is regulated to own within the subsequent studies (entered because step 1). To own anticipate of secure caregiving classification (P-CAI/F) i therefore entered, into the 1, many years of education additionally the parent’s probable loving and rejecting skills having mom and dad, correspondingly (Dining table step three). Really the only significant predictor is probable loving experiences towards the mom (Wald = 8.97, p = .003). Rather, numerous years of training generated zero extreme contribution towards the finally predictive model. New co-parent’s accessory scriptedness (ASA-score), with high score indicating a coherent malfunction from sensitive and painful and you will responsive child-rearing, inserted for the an extra action somewhat improved prediction off secure caregiving, and therefore classified 84.2% of the times truthfully. Moms and dad intercourse, joined in the a 3rd action, generated no contribution, exhibiting one to parent gender is not implicated inside, and does not separate brand new prediction regarding, full quality of caregiving logo (P-CAI) (H5). On last model (Desk 3), probable loving experiences with their mothers (AAI) notably increased, and likely experiences of getting rejected from the their fathers (AAI) rather shorter, parents’ likelihood of are categorized while the having Independent caregiving representations.
Had written on line:
To address hypotheses 2–4 concerning links between specific state of mind dimensions of the parent’s caregiving representation and his/her classification with respect to attachment, MANOVA was carried out with P-CAI state of mind subscales as dependent variables: idealization of the child and co-parent, respectively, derogation of the relationship to the child, anger towards the child and co-parent, respectively, parental guilt, and preoccupied feelings of rejection. Parent AAI-classification (Dismissive vs. Preoccupied vs. Autonomous) and gender (mother vs. father) were grouping variables. In addition to the expected main multivariate effect of AAI classification (Wilks’?, F(14, 128) = 7.28, p< .0001, ? 2 = .445), the analysis revealed a multivariate effect of parent gender (Wilks'?, F(seven, 64) = 2.65, p = .018, ? 2 = .225), and a multivariate AAI-classification X gender interaction effect (Wilks’?, F(14, 128) = 2.74, p = .001, ? 2 = .231). Among parents with Preoccupied (AAI/E) current attachment representations, there was more preoccupying anger toward the co-parent among mothers, compared to fathers, F(1, 71) = 4.88, p = .03, ? 2 = .06 (Mfathers = 2.10, SD = 1.41, Mmothers = 2.37, SD = 1.87) (Figure 1(a)). The multivariate effect of co-parent attachment scriptedness (ASA) as covariate was not statistically significant in this analysis (Wilks’?, F(7, 64) = 1.87, p = .09, ? 2 = .169), but a univariate effect on parental guilt was found, with more elaborate and readily available attachment scripts in the co-parent predicting lower levels of preoccupying guilt in the parent. Notably, the gender difference in preoccupying anger towards the co-parent was no longer significant.