Author: a number of the reviewer’s remarks were therefore defectively written, how do he be described as a judge that is good of!
- It is correct that numerous reviewers don’t have English because their very very very very first language. Maybe they discovered your English ended up being hard to realize, or maybe they certainly were afraid that other reviewers would point this out and felt ashamed when they failed to state any such thing concerning the English language. Some speakers that are non-English it can conserve face should they criticised the language.
Writer: You asked a colleague through the United States to read through your paper in which he stated it absolutely was fine!
- Possibly the English in your paper had been okay, but simply not adequate enough for book. Possibly your colleague ended up being attempting to be good, and failed to would you like to state the English ended up being thought by him had been not adequate enough. Possibly your colleague didn’t need to get stuck with all the work of re-writing your paper. Maybe he simply didn’t realize your paper and didn’t wish to acknowledge it.
Writer: you imagine the reviewer is judging your English more harshly since it’s from Asia.
- Most journals run a “blind” peer review, in other terms. any such thing pinpointing the author is eliminated before giving for review. But, you will find frequently clues in the paper, such as for instance mentions of past magazines, or of Chinese research. Additionally any indigenous English presenter will choose through to English that simply will not appear normal to him, whether or not theoretically grammatical – do you realize any People in america who is able to write perfect Chinese?
List of positive actions
- Have you figured out a person with exemplary English whom you could ask to help you from the English in your paper? Preferably, this will be an individual who knows the material of one’s paper, or at the very least is knowledgeable about the needs of systematic book.
- Make use of the solutions of a business like ISE, with an established history of English language modifying for scientific documents. For more info, e mail us only at
Simple tips to react:
- We regret there have been difficulties with the English. The paper happens to be very carefully revised by [a indigenous English presenter]/[a professional language modifying service] to boost the sentence structure and readability.
Reviewer: There’s nothing brand new in this paper.
Author: needless to say there was! Didn’t he read it properly?
- Possibly this got lost into the information associated with the paper whenever you published it. Many writers get overly enthusiastic composing their techniques and outcomes, with a great deal of information, but forget to include a conclusion that is strong.
- Maybe you would not desire to boast a lot of about your findings, or believed that it had been apparent that the outcome revealed a major step of progress.
- Maybe you would not talk about other research in the region, either with it, or you did not want to draw attention to https://www.essay-writing.org/write-my-paper similar work because you assumed the reviewer would be familiar. Possibly you had been thought by the reviewer were maybe perhaps not alert to this research.
- Perhaps here really isn’t anything new in your quest. For the reason that situation, it’s not likely to obtain posted. But clearly there will be something not used to report: a bigger research team, a method that is different learn populace?
Do the following
- Keep in mind that numerous editors state that the number 1 cause for rejecting a paper is simply because it generally does not provide one thing brand new. Although research builds that are most on work done before, no body would like to spend time reading about research that doesn’t show any such thing brand brand new. Consequently it must be made by you clear what’s brand brand brand new regarding your research findings.
- Go through your paper carefully to spot places where you can make clear what’s brand new.
- Pay particular focus on the abstract, conversation and summary (or concluding sentences)
- Include additional information in regards to the implications of one’s research
- If required, include some increased detail about other research in this area that is subject and exactly how your quest varies with this. Discuss conflicting research.
Just how to react:
- Many thanks because of this valuable feedback.
research [is the first ever to show that…]/[confirms the findings of White et al. in a more youthful generation…]/[improves the yield of…]. we’ve added a phrase towards the Abstract ( web web web page 2 line 5, and paragraph into the conversation part ( web page 15 starting line 8), to explain this.
Reviewer: highlights a mistake in your paper